nacodeal_logo_72dpi

Meeting Minute

I-02-1 / Rev.1

 

Page  1  de  2

Date:

24/09/2013

Start Time:

09:00

End Time:

14:00

 

Subject of the meeting

Norrkoping Meeting NACODEAL Project

 

Assistants:

Antonio Remartinez; Carlos Catalina, Maite Cobo, Luca Bordoni, Mona Komulainen; Daria Kyslitska

 

Subject

 

 

On the Norrkoping meeting of the Project the following subjects were treated:

 

1.      ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS AND DISSEMINATION EVENTS

 

For the administrative matters the project partners review the next steps which will be the Annual Progress review of 2013 the National Project Review of 2013 and the Final Report in 2014.

The project for asking a delay has started, in 2 weeks from the ending of the AAL Forum, a list of Deliverables with the actual status and the prevision for the DOW2 will be sent for approval, if the approval is given the DOW will be change accordingly and sent to the commission for further approval.

There was pinpoint the fact that there were some Approval of deliverables missing and was asked a bigger rigor within the approval process.

Considering the Dissemination.

It was highlighted the fact that some of the preview dissemination actions had to be still covered. It was required a Newsletter from the end-users and one newsletter from the technical partners.

These articles will be sent by the partners to other technical magazines in order to publish at least one article each (IBERNEX; IMAXDI and ITCL) in the next 4 months.

ITCL will invite all the NACODEAL partners to the created LinkedIn group to start a discussion group for the next project steps.

Next project meeting will take place in Feb. in Paris or Italy at the time the tests start so the technicians are able to see the first steps and train the conductors of the trials.

IBERNEX and COOSS explained the different dissemination actuations that will be performed for the presentation of NACODEAL at the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

A presentation of COOSS intervention in the AAL FORUM was done to all the project partners in order to give the possible comments to the presentation. A video of the trials with the tablet done in ANCONA was shown.

 

2.      TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

WP3

A presentation of the actual status of WP3 was given, a change has been made with relation with the creation of the house map, and new opportunities with the use of Kinet were tested and included in the program.

 

WP4

A question about the possible ethical problems that could appear in case of theft or lost of the tablet if the users information is not coded was made and the possible solutions to be evaluated were as follow:

- When you report the disappearance / theft , disable the user account on the server, so that the application could not connect to the server and retrieve user details .

- If the application marked as disabled once it connects to the server, it would give the order to erase all user data.

- If the application does not connect to the server again (having been uninstalled by the wrongdoer ) , for data that are already locally on the tablet for having previously downloaded , I will check that Android offers encryption mechanisms (right now I do not remember exactly , but that it provides functionalities for both the database to user data ) the final solution will be explained in the D4.3.

WP5

The new version of the prototype was explained to the project partners, the size of the DCPAR had been reduce and the end-users agreed that this size could be used for the initial trials by the users, the quality of the image was proved and good enough for the partners.

4 more units will be developed by December when the Software of the DCPAR becomes integrated with the prototype.

There is still a requirement from ITCL to IBERNEX to deliver the protocols of communication so ITCL is able to finish with the integration of the software on the prototype.

 

WP6

The deliverables created during the performance of wp6. Regarding the state of art study performed , the project partners decided to include a deeper study of the SOTA in Europe and in Spain.

Regarding the static contents and the dynamic contents that were also explained during the meeting, the project partners asked for a deeper description of the contents related to the different state of mental health of the potential users, providing an analysis of the dynamic test base on these studies.

WP8

The planning for the testing was explained by Cooss and Eseniors but due to the delay in the development of the devices it will be initially changed. The availability of a limited number of devices also forces some changes in the planning.

It was studied the best way to perform the tests and it was indicated as shown in the following graphic:

 

 

A model of a technical validation plan will be sent by ITCL in order to study the possibility of using it during the project.

WP9

The final Draft of D. 9.1.  will be sent and a future review after the best test will be done with the results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Created by: Maite Cobo

Date: 02/10/2013

Reviewed by: Maite Cobo

Date: 02/10/2013